{"id":"W1725627099","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9922.2010.00562.x","title":"Interactions Between Type of Instruction and Type of Language Feature: A Meta‐Analysis","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Language Learning","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":735,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Psychology; Simple (philosophy); Meta-analysis; Van de Graaff generator; Type (biology); Second-language acquisition; Cognitive psychology; Feature (linguistics); Linguistics; Natural language processing; Mathematics education; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02041242,0.002711321,0.0131165,0.004427392,0.0008741103,0.00290143,0.002653839,0.003152112,0.004142827],"category_scores_gemma":[0.05121809,0.001497174,0.03309618,0.005191065,0.001174969,0.00191443,0.001193589,0.002330876,0.0003655943],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002015404,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001948158,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0035878,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006379485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9838766,0.01006319,0.00255622,0.001832417,0.001308932,0.0003625427],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9402226,0.0524736,0.00366505,0.001675273,0.001449694,0.0005137807],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.009471508,0.0001024552,0.01180291,0.06211879,0.9073232,0.0002573013,0.000218185,0.0005795307,0.0006754249,0.0001680478,0.0004176909,0.006864973],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00168416,0.000907573,0.006275708,0.002172994,0.9869932,0.00008510172,0.00006055826,0.0002794637,0.0005060582,0.0002028969,0.0008085226,0.00002371391],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.205871,0.7713491,0.01185818,0.0009672647,0.0009649631,0.002861121,0.003986234,0.00034659,0.001795587],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8750064,0.1051463,0.01100707,0.0006821991,0.0002561897,0.005382972,0.001257676,0.0001177573,0.001143386],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02041242,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1079525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.045557419513944,"score_gpt":0.3176710019718397,"score_spread":0.2721135824578957,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}