{"id":"W1726476178","doi":"","title":"Exploring Judicial Appreciations of Parental Addiction in Child Custody and Access Decisions: Quebec as a Case Study","year":2009,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"SSRN Electronic Journal","topic":"Ethics and Legal Issues in Pediatric Healthcare","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Addiction; Relevance (law); Best interests; Context (archaeology); Psychology; Child custody; Judicial opinion; Political science; Law; Criminology; Psychiatry","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003698074,0.0003184261,0.0003243047,0.001249777,0.01921095,0.003598843,0.00171516,0.004434045,0.003376441],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007598369,0.0003723389,0.000332473,0.00195428,0.007006303,0.001347627,0.002425476,0.004752418,0.000106212],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07064877,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03608036,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9506115,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9818944,"domain_scores_codex":[0.996678,0.001502203,0.00007430906,0.000205637,0.0005684635,0.0009714543],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9934617,0.00427894,0.0005679172,0.0001866964,0.0009336927,0.0005710367],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001029139,0.0003915103,0.07596686,0.0002196561,0.00005837224,0.05897143,0.5067794,0.002070674,0.002074648,0.300558,0.02469517,0.02811141],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008499203,0.0001945882,0.1338528,0.001060021,0.0001026401,0.01175062,0.6380354,0.005253225,0.001695109,0.01249613,0.1952953,0.0001793059],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9281303,0.002315405,0.0009545246,0.01658887,0.00007252327,0.00008883822,0.0001151491,0.00001224956,0.05172214],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9901596,0.0010953,0.0006200185,0.001989184,0.00001783471,0.00004107372,0.00002817909,0.000005034639,0.006043863],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07064877,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5125951,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08804567703165736,"score_gpt":0.3984672798394126,"score_spread":0.3104216028077552,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}