{"id":"W174309765","doi":"10.1071/pc020108","title":"Landscape surrogates of forest fragmentation: Synthesis of Australian Montreal Process case studies","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Pacific Conservation Biology","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Fragmentation (computing); Geography; Biodiversity; Habitat; Ecology; Landscape ecology; Habitat fragmentation; Habitat destruction; Environmental resource management; Intact forest landscape; Forest management; Sustainable forest management; Forest fragmentation; Forestry; Forest ecology; Environmental science; Ecosystem; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001605859,0.00008799952,0.0002115627,0.0000435108,0.00009653765,0.000001825461,0.00006294346,0.0000681954,0.0007301747],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002040136,0.00007565141,0.00003321756,0.0001768235,0.0004704093,0.00007214165,0.00003155291,0.00004011225,0.00002802895],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001747162,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000003303394,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000170608,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003642543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992828,0.00007787479,0.0003036257,0.0001639367,0.00005331407,0.0001184521],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991171,0.0004858321,0.0002212104,0.0000995572,0.0000555631,0.00002072485],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001218563,0.00006550743,0.9956383,0.00003810825,0.00006670968,0.000007923961,0.001708633,0.0003713428,0.0002949794,0.0003440994,0.0006622671,0.0007899043],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008020754,0.0003254558,0.9574612,0.00003616091,0.000131658,0.0001721358,0.022581,0.009049773,0.003039651,0.005676639,0.0004164533,0.0003078165],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9922892,0.0001052277,0.00002574199,0.001310982,0.00006385945,0.0001296449,0.00002794328,0.00001454014,0.006032797],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9990649,0.000161053,0.000252211,0.00002858712,0.00000612259,0.00004874012,0.00001028785,0.000003556894,0.0004245121],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03817715,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.79949,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02917576386264482,"score_gpt":0.2765775516666071,"score_spread":0.2474017878039623,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}