{"id":"W1748022325","doi":"10.1139/cjfas-2013-0055","title":"Population social structure and gizzard shad density influence the size-specific growth of bluegill","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Illinois Department of Natural Resources","keywords":"Dorosoma; Gizzard shad; Intraspecific competition; Biology; Predation; Population density; Lepomis macrochirus; Ecology; Population size; Population; Centrarchidae; Competition (biology); Age structure; Fishery; Zoology; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003902678,0.0002429225,0.0001622723,0.0003123948,0.0002477657,0.0003986064,0.0001988241,0.0002090118,0.000647079],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001771633,0.0002083999,0.0003966514,0.0001207439,0.0004370193,0.0002516322,0.0004632424,0.0001791372,0.00007550769],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006869389,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003530481,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02718538,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05528978,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999818,0.00008730052,0.000008893983,0.00003123757,0.000024984,0.00002954808],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991816,0.0003778117,0.0002346515,0.00004705785,0.00006993815,0.0000890083],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005267966,0.00003255068,0.986647,0.00001007379,0.0001309436,0.00005877861,0.0001701419,0.005098904,0.00441465,0.000124546,0.00007369446,0.003185915],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003263287,0.00006690904,0.9838456,0.000002186784,0.00003895675,0.00002614896,0.00009936994,0.01553369,0.0002044566,0.0001171293,0.00005826362,0.00000400742],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9997973,0.00001163522,0.00007919015,0.000008554062,2.140522e-7,6.945068e-7,0.000006857537,0.000001971277,0.00009354635],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9997928,0.00001284262,0.00009914332,0.000003924004,7.136403e-7,0.000001326768,0.00002475803,9.887525e-7,0.00006347012],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02718538,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05405426,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009482009874769715,"score_gpt":0.1863461215532348,"score_spread":0.1768641116784651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}