{"id":"W1749132058","doi":"10.5555/1795234.1795242","title":"Participatory design and web 2.0: the case of PIPWatch, the collaborative privacy toolbar","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Participatory Design Conference","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"World Wide Web; Computer science; Citizen journalism; Participatory design; Internet privacy; Web service; Web 2.0; Information privacy; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06637697,0.0009321487,0.0006621952,0.002074597,0.03184104,0.0135345,0.002938632,0.008270323,0.003936637],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04863589,0.001037687,0.001030975,0.003031711,0.04473519,0.01251814,0.01865324,0.00614843,0.0008042932],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.006723082,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.009439535,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008485757,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00950002,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8698542,0.1199873,0.0008661996,0.002728808,0.003717759,0.002845686],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9345338,0.05475034,0.001674373,0.005204078,0.001679418,0.002157938],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009286046,0.000141339,0.002066189,0.0003624684,0.00002400114,0.006243761,0.5095493,0.001451407,0.0007403104,0.4388488,0.005202023,0.03527758],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001190614,0.0003460897,0.001490954,0.0009194222,0.00003921845,0.004436901,0.2767293,0.002876884,0.0021568,0.2682459,0.4425243,0.0001150948],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2823598,0.004701319,0.3175538,0.08218914,0.0007789527,0.00249492,0.0001500959,0.0004148966,0.3093571],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9120646,0.001317063,0.05973346,0.003649796,0.00009753159,0.001777941,0.0000459457,0.0001652033,0.02114855],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06637697,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3510392,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2295377975823902,"score_gpt":0.3606885299138973,"score_spread":0.1311507323315071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}