{"id":"W1749132058","doi":"10.5555/1795234.1795242","title":"Participatory design and web 2.0: the case of PIPWatch, the collaborative privacy toolbar","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Participatory Design Conference","topic":"Privacy, Security, and Data Protection","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"World Wide Web; Computer science; Citizen journalism; Participatory design; Internet privacy; Web service; Web 2.0; Information privacy; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003792917,0.000221143,0.0002950545,0.00005240934,0.002077382,0.0001210711,0.0007085711,0.0001343641,0.0001891472],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002229426,0.0001464395,0.00004289419,0.0004829549,0.002473077,0.0004773922,0.0002345892,0.0002941832,0.00004904386],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006442516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001551895,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001392467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006605723,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9944373,0.003793268,0.0004388533,0.0003795671,0.0003893961,0.0005615585],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966755,0.0016628,0.0002673761,0.0007113622,0.0004549543,0.0002279877],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001145874,0.001007015,0.01060475,0.0001527758,0.0004680981,0.001432113,0.7159054,0.0006209051,0.01493193,0.1926953,0.04203726,0.01899858],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.008790721,0.003875306,0.02283254,0.0004865037,0.002096805,0.001282156,0.2246851,0.1512063,0.1393558,0.1365277,0.3033479,0.005513186],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8788221,0.001980119,0.1095098,0.003697687,0.0004905369,0.003397516,0.00007116035,0.0001991346,0.001831968],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9972525,0.0006533864,0.001176605,0.0002344375,0.0001250522,0.0004451547,0.000001594459,0.00001531961,0.00009590592],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4912203,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9992218,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2295377975823902,"score_gpt":0.3606885299138973,"score_spread":0.1311507323315071,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}