{"id":"W1750395591","doi":"10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020120806.1688","title":"Theoretical Analysis on Chinese Public’s Participation in Environmental Matters—Institutionalization Approach","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Cross-cultural communication","topic":"Environmental law and policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Certainty; Institutionalisation; Public participation; Set (abstract data type); Public relations; Action (physics); Affect (linguistics); Political science; Key (lock); Sociology; Public administration; Law; Computer science; Epistemology; Computer security","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003497773,0.0003352961,0.000311179,0.001838672,0.004281907,0.003936065,0.001246423,0.001454348,0.007534661],"category_scores_gemma":[0.004049616,0.0001943156,0.0005913634,0.001679258,0.01032784,0.003838975,0.003872751,0.001431452,0.0002295249],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0103654,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007585087,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01957196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007765741,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9966563,0.001535292,0.0001214911,0.0003161717,0.0005807318,0.000789962],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9976633,0.001287913,0.0003008424,0.0002254899,0.0002954817,0.0002269699],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001261656,0.00003868204,0.002638796,0.00003419713,0.000005968191,0.0002151996,0.01123938,0.0008458474,0.00008645165,0.9812443,0.0004080485,0.003230519],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000681353,0.00009734053,0.01575529,0.0002750654,0.00009644624,0.0003966813,0.04941063,0.02789437,0.0008338257,0.8667346,0.03837662,0.00006091601],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5116614,0.0009462878,0.03048602,0.0176126,0.00006425147,0.0002776813,0.0001121183,0.00004021532,0.4387994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9968741,0.0001292585,0.0004765244,0.0001277207,0.00001354581,0.00005971762,0.00001553038,0.000002135346,0.002301336],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01957196,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.07520658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02799945026313744,"score_gpt":0.3725189810564747,"score_spread":0.3445195307933373,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}