{"id":"W1750495335","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9396.2012.01056.x","title":"Import Variety and Welfare Gain in China","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Review of International Economics","topic":"Global trade and economics","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"China; Variety (cybernetics); Restrictiveness; Economics; Welfare; Index (typography); Gross domestic product; Product (mathematics); International economics; International trade; Macroeconomics; Geography; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004898774,0.000196022,0.0001808621,0.00124898,0.0002595497,0.0006586912,0.0001595552,0.0001782429,0.002003135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008786015,0.0000561471,0.0002620946,0.001445341,0.0006840546,0.0004725397,0.0007404329,0.0002911143,0.0001062762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001330419,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005413536,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01168353,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01463914,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998241,0.00003985332,0.000009580645,0.00002568652,0.0000420717,0.00005876148],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993198,0.00008882015,0.0003498343,0.00004354548,0.0001205351,0.00007747614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004319717,0.0001174243,0.9305021,0.0001321941,0.0002672389,0.001098439,0.0007426058,0.01065783,0.002124815,0.01541119,0.002130764,0.03638341],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001636639,0.00008328782,0.9884396,0.00003438229,0.00004958283,0.000142025,0.0004800436,0.002487426,0.0004769164,0.003926043,0.003853376,0.00001097166],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9916003,0.0007376585,0.0002628021,0.0003021519,0.000006374017,0.000006026033,0.0005458874,0.00001022108,0.006528662],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989678,0.0002035664,0.00003365096,0.0000265751,0.000006238072,0.000002298205,0.0002763788,8.751649e-7,0.0004828207],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01168353,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02323103,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03066908603405278,"score_gpt":0.2326024509520029,"score_spread":0.2019333649179501,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}