{"id":"W1753648067","doi":"","title":"Literary Translation From Perspective of Reception Theory: The Case Study of Three Versions of Na Han","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in literature and language","topic":"Translation Studies and Practices","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Indeterminacy (philosophy); Horizon; Perspective (graphical); Rhetoric; Reception theory; Literature; Interpretation (philosophy); Style (visual arts); Linguistics; Literary translation; Literary science; Reproduction; Space (punctuation); Philosophy; Literary criticism; Sociology; Aesthetics; Epistemology; Art; Mathematics; Visual arts","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001863189,0.0000903464,0.0002143654,0.00006865642,0.0001371882,0.00002632803,0.0000489079,0.00002766737,0.0001226378],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002111544,0.00005307184,0.00004023603,0.00008348976,0.0002450745,0.0002808714,0.00002262975,0.0001223302,4.324239e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000004912037,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00000376918,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003406149,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007463116,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993533,0.0001475582,0.0002271396,0.000118062,0.00009139824,0.00006252527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990077,0.0005777609,0.0001336787,0.0001275999,0.0001443233,0.000008907388],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007810379,0.000119267,0.000858366,0.00004725213,0.000251922,0.00001677507,0.9678704,7.670333e-7,0.00009174971,0.01127135,0.0001010093,0.01929302],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005995655,0.0002540195,0.001619846,0.0001409518,0.0001030296,0.000004283015,0.9876204,0.00001124888,0.00002460427,0.00853241,0.001023525,0.00006611674],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9172021,0.07572003,0.00000414665,0.0002138443,0.000132713,0.0003281898,0.00009623172,0.000006111198,0.00629669],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992315,0.0005045722,0.00004987479,0.00002693414,0.00009222484,0.0000168759,0.000007326687,0.000004719044,0.00006594019],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.08202948,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5149102,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04687323838033371,"score_gpt":0.3122914302395142,"score_spread":0.2654181918591805,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}