{"id":"W1764645577","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2660","title":"Taking purposes seriously: The purposive scope and textual bounds of interpretation under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Originalism; Meaning (existential); Judicial interpretation; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002844275,0.00003837263,0.0000901434,0.00001173644,0.001242279,0.00002721153,0.0001316855,0.00002906961,0.00005228408],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001778075,0.00002530954,0.00002582703,0.00002285893,0.001862559,0.0002480905,0.00003538245,0.00005415583,2.402278e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000141511,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002311671,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9596109,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9965596,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9995351,0.00008108388,0.00007209031,0.000045153,0.0001819482,0.00008455223],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994739,0.00004672538,0.0001469121,0.00003274426,0.0002217414,0.00007799233],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007860738,0.00001597528,0.00261671,0.000003196554,0.0001605811,0.000005003224,0.09090529,0.00001784513,0.00004087175,0.9018809,0.0005696231,0.003705359],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001686642,0.0005288043,0.1242612,0.0003367197,0.0003765823,0.00005752572,0.654425,0.00009556626,0.00008969043,0.09697346,0.1208574,0.000311449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6578853,0.006822509,0.0002273352,0.005759897,0.0002917775,0.0003091012,0.00002705414,0.000004940558,0.3286721],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996399,0.0001799583,0.00003776556,0.00004564673,0.00004689357,6.208651e-8,2.231417e-7,7.568611e-7,0.00004875354],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8049075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9554729,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01907488820453316,"score_gpt":0.240325353376364,"score_spread":0.2212504651718308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}