{"id":"W1764645577","doi":"10.3138/utlj.2660","title":"Taking purposes seriously: The purposive scope and textual bounds of interpretation under the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"University of Toronto Law Journal","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Charter; Interpretation (philosophy); Jurisprudence; Law; Supreme court; Constitution; Political science; Legitimacy; Context (archaeology); Originalism; Meaning (existential); Judicial interpretation; Scope (computer science); Law and economics; Sociology; Epistemology; Politics; Computer science; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02075749,0.0007150494,0.0008499151,0.004192556,0.03101572,0.02903364,0.002773564,0.004548646,0.002672658],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03758339,0.0008737056,0.0006655719,0.004604149,0.1504786,0.01133572,0.01127272,0.008916001,0.0003263552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.07329427,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1059703,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.7880925,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7971842,"domain_scores_codex":[0.965694,0.01678727,0.0009826929,0.001963236,0.01026633,0.004306466],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9671943,0.02183708,0.001468637,0.002575511,0.005584765,0.001339643],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007393717,0.000003875891,0.000255981,0.00001941096,0.000002571032,0.00005105033,0.04774043,0.0001010038,0.00008584698,0.9463508,0.001075379,0.004306123],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004070535,0.00001838076,0.003249963,0.0005910933,0.00004203835,0.0001147746,0.07139251,0.0009024424,0.0006417714,0.7823972,0.1405079,0.0001013144],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.08323129,0.00564106,0.02655139,0.06471032,0.0003714464,0.0001130636,0.0001474681,0.0001033724,0.8191305],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9809496,0.001073418,0.004421428,0.0022996,0.0001063449,0.00008256995,0.00003753976,0.00006379253,0.01096576],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2119075,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5317897,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01907488820453316,"score_gpt":0.240325353376364,"score_spread":0.2212504651718308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}