{"id":"W1765958569","doi":"10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.08.056","title":"A meta-analysis of carbon capture and storage technology assessments: Understanding the driving factors of variability in cost estimates","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Applied Energy","topic":"Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies","field":"Engineering","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Cost of electricity by source; Comparability; Capital cost; Econometrics; Carbon capture and storage (timeline); Regression analysis; Electricity; Environmental science; Environmental economics; Engineering; Statistics; Electricity generation; Power (physics); Economics; Mathematics; Climate change","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06702205,0.003052951,0.01075176,0.004836221,0.000718587,0.004445097,0.002647212,0.00296442,0.001631162],"category_scores_gemma":[0.154648,0.001575947,0.05490296,0.006384323,0.0011027,0.002451075,0.002108685,0.003370775,0.0002645295],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00180571,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002061646,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007189505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008513508,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9122494,0.06606403,0.009772903,0.006884259,0.004194656,0.0008347429],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8057805,0.1670311,0.01018859,0.01210632,0.00415821,0.0007353353],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002752277,0.00001743984,0.01458585,0.007801711,0.9680393,0.00007303938,0.0000578262,0.001123326,0.0002404492,0.0002071168,0.000386304,0.004715354],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005676205,0.000265356,0.0117046,0.001198346,0.9828592,0.0001063089,0.00004216176,0.001106615,0.0002270463,0.0008513994,0.001042068,0.00002938244],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1796619,0.7630218,0.04380725,0.002911476,0.001536042,0.0007689141,0.006001619,0.0004375002,0.001853624],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9438595,0.03887744,0.01235373,0.001573389,0.0003894896,0.0005858642,0.001679652,0.0001930452,0.0004879267],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.06702205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3544507,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05441984259430743,"score_gpt":0.2583906843431052,"score_spread":0.2039708417487978,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}