{"id":"W1767540702","doi":"10.1139/x2012-009","title":"Identification of representative sampling heights for specific gravity and moisture content in plantation-grown loblolly pine (<i>Pinus taeda</i>)","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Department of Agriculture","keywords":"Loblolly pine; Sampling (signal processing); Diameter at breast height; Pinus <genus>; Tree (set theory); Mathematics; Specific gravity; Water content; Volume (thermodynamics); Forestry; Botany; Horticulture; Mineralogy; Biology; Chemistry; Geology; Physics; Geography; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004779671,0.0001751864,0.0002297878,0.0007232712,0.0004222452,0.0003339849,0.0003142959,0.0002428922,0.0001760639],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007029216,0.0001639416,0.0001235785,0.0004715087,0.0002153351,0.0002049678,0.0002255376,0.0001521303,0.00009427022],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003394225,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002768876,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.012739,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05502858,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997937,0.00003243589,0.00001117566,0.00006331421,0.00006644423,0.00003296434],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994289,0.0001275444,0.0001767415,0.00002598428,0.0001506563,0.00009007069],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00021583,0.0001358671,0.7625617,0.0000785697,0.00003324098,0.0002950265,0.001126102,0.0008464284,0.2155475,0.00006569567,0.000152146,0.01894182],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00000137279,0.00005897854,0.993549,0.000002311029,0.000007091028,0.00007425492,0.0001695576,0.0006409024,0.005350816,0.00001252456,0.0001291431,0.000003928329],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.998493,0.00006656243,0.00110674,0.000003560431,0.000001347601,0.00001387634,0.00008585033,0.00001999162,0.0002091734],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9956846,0.00005655083,0.003875759,0.00001210745,0.000002633067,0.00001915552,0.0002180777,0.000006582048,0.0001245939],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.012739,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02532971,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0766225316351451,"score_gpt":0.323356826607068,"score_spread":0.2467342949719229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}