{"id":"W1769225212","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2966.2010.17798.x","title":"Observing gravitational lenses from intensity fluctuations: experimental validation of the technique","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society","topic":"Galaxies: Formation, Evolution, Phenomena","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université Laval","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Detector; Gravitational lens; Optics; Current (fluid); Quadratic equation; Gravitation; Simple (philosophy); Statistical physics; Work (physics); Computational physics; Intensity (physics); Classical mechanics; Astrophysics; Mathematics; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002707742,0.0005078454,0.0002988919,0.000643059,0.0006012061,0.000840786,0.001224274,0.001037106,0.001871059],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006471496,0.0002910924,0.0002016499,0.0006668631,0.002193026,0.001436893,0.001304791,0.001111201,0.0004791396],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005066166,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004024064,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007795176,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005730464,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979758,0.0008032564,0.00007002556,0.0003677095,0.0006676488,0.0001155799],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9947482,0.002431015,0.0003968144,0.001720373,0.0005457232,0.0001579695],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001151216,0.0009485917,0.01961316,0.0003876718,0.0001712253,0.0003329718,0.001188557,0.006353118,0.7959228,0.07139684,0.001978867,0.100555],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005580721,0.003363598,0.0485171,0.0001299479,0.0001777903,0.0021973,0.000578852,0.09180417,0.7704217,0.05605575,0.02581509,0.0003806928],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.3213844,0.001906135,0.6545701,0.001069161,0.0002899828,0.0004459136,0.0005926778,0.001081493,0.01866011],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8474289,0.0007231606,0.1492066,0.0003390804,0.000144027,0.0002373674,0.0002252735,0.0001357021,0.001559851],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.002707742,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01432002,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009013393933489705,"score_gpt":0.2123856301453019,"score_spread":0.2033722362118122,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}