{"id":"W1772161618","doi":"10.37693/pjos.2008.2.8826","title":"Conceptual blending and sign formation","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Journal of Semiotics","topic":"Language, Metaphor, and Cognition","field":"Psychology","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Semiotics; Sign (mathematics); Conceptual blending; Linguistics; Logos Bible Software; Mechanism (biology); Process (computing); Statement (logic); Cognitive science; Conceptual framework; Cognition; Sign system; Computer science; Epistemology; Psychology; Philosophy; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004362552,0.00007334282,0.0001519462,0.0001523123,0.00009425344,0.00002975092,0.00009115174,0.0000710331,0.0003433207],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00015203,0.00006016804,0.00005030511,0.0001175597,0.00009927575,0.000438995,0.00001469962,0.000206088,0.00002417754],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00002799955,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000366142,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000002501277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":9.374072e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999143,0.00009463457,0.0003307346,0.00006398447,0.0001891724,0.000178445],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992195,0.0001163318,0.000285076,0.0000738138,0.0001949748,0.0001103201],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004016775,0.001292337,0.05298179,0.0001120231,0.001180486,0.001557551,0.1989587,0.00002889617,0.009502264,0.3427416,0.1233232,0.2679195],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.02459599,0.004063233,0.2459131,0.000481421,0.001084797,0.08618633,0.2812174,0.0009077924,0.009448247,0.0322361,0.3114219,0.002443665],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9711112,0.001474119,0.01318298,0.0007392335,0.000692109,0.00005731895,0.000003885275,0.00001592727,0.01272322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981454,0.000254163,0.000549456,0.0003620404,0.000367523,5.558914e-7,0.000003832032,0.000008525504,0.0003085119],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3105055,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3759121,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05317211132055735,"score_gpt":0.2889984362566559,"score_spread":0.2358263249360985,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}