{"id":"W1774591799","doi":"10.1186/cc3803","title":"A systematic evaluation of the quality of meta-analyses in the critical care literature","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Critical Care","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":142,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Intensive care medicine; Quality (philosophy); Systematic review; MEDLINE","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_broad"],"category_scores_codex":[0.1769313,0.0007835154,0.02234572,0.0005287584,0.0001486901,0.0008115746,0.005087497,0.0005138124,0.002792498],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4831249,0.0002297371,0.01996673,0.004026969,0.0004565249,0.0001946675,0.000281273,0.0007968474,0.000147884],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001735156,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005627455,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001345167,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00009266644,"domain_scores_codex":[0.7798025,0.1762391,0.02335306,0.001330071,0.01889659,0.0003786527],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8989099,0.06896878,0.005952111,0.01018573,0.0158381,0.0001453472],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002150793,0.000130473,0.00001733906,0.8986922,0.002698757,0.000005462927,0.01010547,0.00001998331,4.379623e-7,0.03243317,0.001079843,0.0548147],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003295488,0.0001098436,0.0001489343,0.1174707,0.6460173,0.00009224536,0.08223747,0.0003947972,0.000003053652,0.009053367,0.1429714,0.00117134],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.00002327789,0.9920781,0.000111844,0.0003591561,0.0002485937,0.003648007,0.0005295032,0.00000238421,0.002999153],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5827658,0.4099429,0.001583265,0.0005837471,0.0005792914,0.003725505,0.0002250102,0.0001089744,0.0004855164],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7812216,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9981191,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9642794673700996,"score_gpt":0.7384202493303376,"score_spread":0.2258592180397621,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}