{"id":"W1775360196","doi":"","title":"Community Engagement in Environmental Assessment for Resource Development: Benefits, Emerging Concerns, Opportunities for Improvement","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Northern review","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Community engagement; Resource (disambiguation); Public engagement; Process (computing); Community development; Public relations; Environmental resource management; Political science; Business; Environmental planning; Computer science; Geography; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002618267,0.0003301754,0.0004559112,0.00003221443,0.0004404325,0.00003419511,0.000447942,0.00007178492,0.0003305132],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004321411,0.0003125129,0.0001394438,0.00008407209,0.0001278601,0.0002442356,0.0004410684,0.0002672008,0.00004229561],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001764508,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006966283,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002010261,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0009555412,"domain_scores_codex":[0.997619,0.000288401,0.0006815181,0.0003428354,0.0005333162,0.0005349576],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989699,0.0001033142,0.0002743697,0.0003773698,0.00000717977,0.0002678602],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004794318,0.001115128,0.1230206,0.000872819,0.00009958624,0.000004643991,0.004252863,0.0003752994,0.0004285585,0.00009373805,0.006565688,0.8631232],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002525041,0.0005952083,0.03261415,0.0008721885,0.0001114597,0.000002094196,0.009415579,0.0001523657,0.0003667059,0.000358271,0.9521891,0.0007978536],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9741662,0.009142982,0.0009770684,0.0018083,0.0002186259,0.006084084,0.0002374439,0.00007515257,0.007290182],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9656069,0.009446871,0.01048118,0.006513091,0.0001355448,0.003703325,0.001187796,0.0001416602,0.002783599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9456234,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999327,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.186193770639953,"score_gpt":0.3474886742346188,"score_spread":0.1612949035946658,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}