{"id":"W1778004173","doi":"10.1007/978-3-642-39071-5_8","title":"Recovering and Utilizing Partial Duality in QBF","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"book-chapter","venue":"Lecture notes in computer science","topic":"Formal Methods in Verification","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Computer science; Representation (politics); Dual (grammatical number); Solver; Context (archaeology); Duality (order theory); Theoretical computer science; Conjunctive normal form; True quantified Boolean formula; Transformation (genetics); Artificial intelligence; Programming language; Mathematics; Discrete mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003400915,0.0006460589,0.001114243,0.001162584,0.00112074,0.002289169,0.001262824,0.001170687,0.005445702],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01590521,0.0007151275,0.001199046,0.001481064,0.001961063,0.005719183,0.003638662,0.002570073,0.001220303],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001305304,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001802608,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002038521,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002374313,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971782,0.001064266,0.00014016,0.0003479816,0.0009049589,0.0003644143],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.994375,0.003154445,0.0001935776,0.001527757,0.0006206689,0.0001285261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00061208,0.0001391323,0.001067581,0.0003384553,0.00004962552,0.0002616577,0.0004777953,0.09885396,0.01128749,0.6023439,0.00629211,0.2782762],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003028427,0.00004469002,0.0001241554,0.00004244669,0.00002457341,0.000101389,0.00007593819,0.2840188,0.006967431,0.7025528,0.005994043,0.00002340401],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02474949,0.0002570219,0.9683894,0.000412794,0.0001027371,0.00006353329,0.0001476355,0.001394996,0.004482339],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.5713032,0.0003294996,0.4207411,0.0001932312,0.0001187906,0.0001162027,0.0005501937,0.0006264914,0.00602131],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005445702,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01821762,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04481505906145033,"score_gpt":0.2930764473280285,"score_spread":0.2482613882665782,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}