{"id":"W1778150177","doi":"10.1139/x2012-090","title":"Evaluating marginal and conditional predictions of taper models in the absence of calibration data","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":98,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Fundación Biodiversidad","keywords":"Calibration; Data set; Mathematics; Statistics; Random effects model; Set (abstract data type); Marginal model; Econometrics; Computer science; Regression analysis; Meta-analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003531592,0.00003205247,0.00006354007,0.0001355503,0.000108603,0.00001010265,0.0003468913,0.00002857652,0.000467448],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000210359,0.00002376743,0.00001113387,0.0001925587,0.0005057776,0.0005708429,0.00006959283,0.0001925092,0.000002562952],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007176659,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001849028,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006224428,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08140995,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998996,0.0001754006,0.0001968158,0.00006233645,0.0003637843,0.0002057284],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994489,0.0001585849,0.00007441887,0.0001552063,0.00003342239,0.0001294805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000174325,0.00004373422,0.9218557,0.00001532777,0.00001201294,0.00000959866,0.001143988,0.03358367,0.00008640427,0.03599608,0.006848457,0.0003875271],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001593486,0.0001228684,0.9562148,0.00001890431,0.000004972968,0.00003172741,0.0004331054,0.02544628,0.000008883669,0.01711981,0.0004163394,0.00002292724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9955654,0.0001408971,0.001184171,0.0006729718,0.00004203355,0.0001368457,0.00003593026,3.351974e-7,0.002221412],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993957,0.00001547277,0.0004691069,0.00002664476,0.0000295842,0.000003372048,0.0000108372,0.000002127572,0.00004717941],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07518551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9409514,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1597993066689035,"score_gpt":0.3783281888440311,"score_spread":0.2185288821751276,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}