{"id":"W1781826013","doi":"10.1139/f2011-025","title":"Data weighting in statistical fisheries stock assessment models","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences","topic":"Marine and fisheries research","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":237,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Weighting; Stock assessment; Stock (firearms); Econometrics; Statistics; Computer science; Fishery; Data mining; Mathematics; Geography; Biology; Fishing","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001221928,0.0001075703,0.0001976772,0.0001063964,0.0002790972,0.0002040002,0.0007817566,0.00003915057,0.006108542],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002100094,0.00008389454,0.00001688207,0.0003313963,0.001373805,0.001388894,0.0001835088,0.0002048864,0.000003227087],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007974112,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004805614,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04186064,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1394082,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985116,0.00007981533,0.0003735202,0.0002413827,0.0003817589,0.0004119912],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999153,0.0001179702,0.0001163305,0.0001705761,0.00001027862,0.0004318181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000008297239,0.00001669125,0.9367474,0.000006998518,0.000006360961,0.0001261368,0.001401849,0.000007473982,0.000008022917,0.0008385495,0.004508968,0.05632329],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006482038,0.001190389,0.7504563,0.00006926118,0.00002802402,0.0002201949,0.008396448,0.1244557,0.00001537732,0.04082998,0.07311963,0.0005705067],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5801739,0.00009566137,0.00410052,0.002066052,0.0002246487,0.0001837526,0.00003799033,0.000005131615,0.4131124],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97081,0.00006671023,0.02860554,0.0001817349,0.00003254316,0.000002550517,0.000002862891,0.000007123625,0.0002909313],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4128214,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9948,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1161288358800304,"score_gpt":0.293614674054628,"score_spread":0.1774858381745976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}