{"id":"W1782140593","doi":"10.48550/arxiv.1202.3706","title":"A Framework for Optimizing Paper Matching","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"arXiv (Cornell University)","topic":"Expert finding and Q&A systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Matching (statistics); Pairwise comparison; Computer science; Set (abstract data type); Domain (mathematical analysis); Frame (networking); Measure (data warehouse); Integer (computer science); Blossom algorithm; Machine learning; Artificial intelligence; Data mining; Information retrieval; Mathematics; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002779834,0.0001226869,0.00013928,0.00008709907,0.000245595,0.00007334672,0.0006135295,0.0001020603,0.00001174915],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003021212,0.0001274119,0.0001075712,0.0003357223,0.00002243373,0.0009963477,0.0001644843,0.0001259082,0.00008305986],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00006689004,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001843337,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000363628,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000204799,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990596,0.00004730239,0.00009934082,0.000320809,0.00004873444,0.0004242474],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990548,0.0002171262,0.00007405253,0.0004628844,0.00003613403,0.0001549949],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006572405,0.00003781615,0.002080093,0.0000137874,0.00002025427,0.000008150503,0.001650334,0.004262112,0.0002355817,0.9910383,0.0002731134,0.0003739009],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002499663,0.0003040378,0.003241649,0.0005152134,0.000105734,0.00008568831,0.003242084,0.5878814,0.002646551,0.3496539,0.0474357,0.002388427],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.07268424,0.00008790387,0.9245897,0.000125181,0.0006648136,0.0001173772,0.000001140007,0.000191452,0.001538184],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9224883,0.000008755556,0.07637289,0.0002302874,0.0001911382,0.000001128717,7.736762e-7,0.00001082598,0.0006958531],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8498041,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5195707,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.08513667651695354,"score_gpt":0.2094413763710582,"score_spread":0.1243046998541047,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}