{"id":"W178462091","doi":"10.3138/cjcrim.43.3.405","title":"An analysis of public support for special consideration of aboriginal offenders at sentencing","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Criminology","topic":"Criminal Justice and Corrections Analysis","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Redress; Imprisonment; Law; Prison; Parliament; Political science; Sanctions; Criminology; Criminal justice; Government (linguistics); Population; Sociology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006279553,0.0002117632,0.0003280675,0.003018275,0.0107798,0.005273134,0.002266644,0.003676973,0.01061475],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04767463,0.0004432789,0.0006170233,0.002662456,0.004469986,0.001731034,0.002868728,0.005087306,0.0006663942],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01973801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02779567,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.3914885,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5945426,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9881611,0.001773287,0.0002492421,0.0004474543,0.004546075,0.00482288],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9686887,0.01453815,0.0044253,0.001247879,0.008940644,0.002159228],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005083225,0.00054845,0.1883666,0.000554824,0.0002421167,0.00494747,0.2012704,0.001247935,0.002447694,0.4284579,0.06992477,0.1014835],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001063683,0.0003416463,0.6282742,0.0007056957,0.0007378262,0.0009835521,0.1670752,0.002149863,0.002335964,0.01711873,0.1800226,0.0001482987],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7106803,0.0007194948,0.0006886815,0.05517089,0.0002050179,0.0001188734,0.0004664172,0.00005499184,0.2318953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9805908,0.0002745951,0.0001879436,0.003286859,0.0001375947,0.00005630295,0.00008972218,0.00001157718,0.01536466],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6085116,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7784195,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1032598128870917,"score_gpt":0.3595215430363274,"score_spread":0.2562617301492357,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}