{"id":"W1785628550","doi":"10.22329/il.v32i1.3146","title":"Scaring the Public: Fear Appeal Arguments in Public Health Reasoning","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Informal Logic","topic":"Behavioral Health and Interventions","field":"Psychology","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Argument (complex analysis); Fear appeal; Context (archaeology); Public health; Subject (documents); Epistemology; Psychology; Compliance (psychology); Social psychology; Political science; Sociology; Positive economics; Law; Medicine; Economics; Computer science; Philosophy; History","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001733981,0.0001291653,0.0001630666,0.0001751259,0.0002948109,0.00008452243,0.0003177141,0.0001114021,0.001137373],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004925716,0.00009214481,0.00008908579,0.0003555815,0.00006447131,0.0008764018,0.0001254611,0.0004804997,0.001158019],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001358296,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008822219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007403336,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002180143,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977563,0.0001600086,0.0005130389,0.0001285607,0.0001808045,0.001261306],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990793,0.00002833853,0.000184578,0.000311308,0.00003587846,0.0003606158],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002028925,0.0003775201,0.5969063,0.00001798194,0.00001412352,0.00000270956,0.003693333,8.800321e-7,8.156517e-7,0.1913971,0.003881523,0.2036874],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005066017,0.0001850528,0.8332595,0.00002816084,0.00000239975,0.00005280466,0.001777301,0.00002712555,8.817441e-7,0.00005778004,0.1639824,0.0001200443],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8634157,0.001101959,0.0001714489,0.006396774,0.001946959,0.000502808,0.00001140127,0.0001207723,0.1263322],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9950048,0.00001421663,0.0001600064,0.003534835,0.0001710482,0.0001032189,0.00003147442,0.00001089232,0.0009694771],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2363531,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997757,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1637459418026531,"score_gpt":0.4120426793228738,"score_spread":0.2482967375202206,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}