{"id":"W1786456074","doi":"10.1111/j.1741-1130.2012.00347.x","title":"Dual Diagnosis Public Policy in a Federal System: The <scp>C</scp>anadian Experience","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities","topic":"Child and Adolescent Health","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":10,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Centre for Addiction and Mental Health; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Legislation; Statute; Ratification; Context (archaeology); Legislature; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Dual (grammatical number); Mental health; Health care; Public administration; Medicine; Business; Political science; Psychiatry; Law; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003814344,0.0002170522,0.0004339734,0.0006035427,0.000679237,0.00009713359,0.0002526539,0.00018867,0.0001091852],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3540927,0.0001467397,0.00009541557,0.0007746552,0.0003889696,0.001506101,0.0001350177,0.001631189,0.00004368152],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001022558,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00169927,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01536318,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003481126,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9942182,0.002990394,0.001205035,0.0001612186,0.0003632628,0.001061934],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8557313,0.1425841,0.0006605168,0.000267166,0.0001890751,0.0005679122],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007162724,0.0003254809,0.1572973,0.0003334988,0.00002104278,0.000005839859,0.7995191,0.000002542631,0.000005069921,0.03062118,0.01033073,0.001466658],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005495974,0.0001492742,0.02695593,0.0006009854,0.000009159892,0.0002868501,0.8513829,0.00001145042,0.000005599672,0.0005763804,0.1194077,0.0000642053],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9481014,0.002952896,0.000007883075,0.02943076,0.0005952745,0.000423285,0.00001511724,0.00001428381,0.01845909],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9872122,0.002620457,0.00003725683,0.005709883,0.003891557,0.00002946354,0.000001004376,0.0000211412,0.0004770254],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.3502784,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911936,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1098306628134718,"score_gpt":0.4362873597345844,"score_spread":0.3264566969211126,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}