{"id":"W1789306940","doi":"10.1016/j.jglr.2015.09.016","title":"Foraging mechanisms of siscowet lake trout (Salvelinus namaycush siscowet) on pelagic prey","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Great Lakes Research","topic":"Fish Ecology and Management Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":12,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Minnesota Sea Grant, University of Minnesota; National Science Foundation","keywords":"Salvelinus; Foraging; Predation; Light intensity; Trout; Prey detection; Photic zone; Pelagic zone; Intensity (physics); Ecology; Environmental science; Biology; Fishery; Physics; Fish <Actinopterygii>; Optics; Phytoplankton","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001259419,0.0001926492,0.0001774114,0.0003703755,0.0003909384,0.0003080616,0.000188679,0.0001769912,0.001192997],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002239286,0.0001853807,0.0001457648,0.0002104727,0.000329244,0.0002288514,0.000402641,0.0001273467,0.0001449966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006655149,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003656698,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.02250439,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.06391744,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999636,0.000004365649,0.000002937299,0.00001135842,0.000004671208,0.00001306367],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998496,0.0000202432,0.0000468662,0.000007759572,0.00001874792,0.00005688131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003121175,0.0002363514,0.6845073,0.0001279449,0.0001221805,0.0003876119,0.002603535,0.001559255,0.2959933,0.0004844786,0.0002399593,0.01061677],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001026859,0.0001089186,0.9972714,0.000004010736,0.00001499842,0.00006822671,0.0004264786,0.0007968702,0.001176072,0.00004238204,0.00007592281,0.000004463189],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9998713,0.000006878875,0.000008901366,0.000001771187,1.687255e-7,5.875063e-7,0.000008999921,4.151254e-7,0.0001010802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9993038,0.00001804679,0.00007093012,0.000005925171,3.697959e-7,0.000004092381,0.00005147615,0.000001421225,0.000543752],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02250439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04474682,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06254257473866905,"score_gpt":0.3290049231125196,"score_spread":0.2664623483738506,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}