{"id":"W1796485570","doi":"10.1002/ieam.1418","title":"A framework for assessing cumulative effects in watersheds: An introduction to Canadian case studies","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Integrated Environmental Assessment and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary; University of British Columbia; University of Waterloo; University of New Brunswick; Dalhousie University; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Cumulative effects; Watershed; Terminology; Environmental science; Environmental resource management; Computer science; Operations research; Engineering; Machine learning","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.008105622,0.001715509,0.0008562779,0.009850582,0.004329578,0.006163431,0.00406812,0.002014865,0.005119594],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008664182,0.0006763145,0.00174638,0.01567184,0.006996544,0.003206411,0.003417425,0.002840209,0.0004495498],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0506592,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03477266,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.856529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.8884696,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9954386,0.001960316,0.0003367242,0.0004178895,0.001393854,0.0004525588],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9966864,0.001399926,0.0002140506,0.0002031048,0.00128198,0.0002144856],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001230332,0.00004012992,0.003353375,0.0003606396,0.00004127612,0.0004835975,0.001621439,0.03259401,0.0004046322,0.8894286,0.01509904,0.05656112],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002047022,0.00006448336,0.007295602,0.001709147,0.00009264358,0.0006415536,0.004154986,0.06276806,0.0006024749,0.4427794,0.4796616,0.0002096618],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.007696232,0.03534161,0.776427,0.01598732,0.0006557387,0.001427596,0.00422548,0.0005038072,0.1577351],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1536391,0.0358135,0.7948332,0.001413766,0.0003315022,0.001796159,0.001310454,0.000233292,0.01062901],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.143471,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.36756,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01766388021714223,"score_gpt":0.3269378760606394,"score_spread":0.3092739958434972,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}