{"id":"W1800247335","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2013-0133","title":"Reevaluating the self-thinning boundary line for ponderosa pine (<i>Pinus ponderosa</i>) forests","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":49,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Thinning; Site index; Forestry; Covariate; Environmental science; Intraspecific competition; Hectare; Population; Forest inventory; Quantile regression; Mathematics; Forest management; Statistics; Ecology; Geography; Biology; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00518773,0.0001764063,0.0002287495,0.0002984407,0.001534769,0.000313521,0.001060127,0.0001302153,0.00191889],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001133802,0.0001264561,0.0001427687,0.0005294468,0.000766513,0.0005385967,0.0001867313,0.0008279436,0.0003496936],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000730656,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009042605,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01216416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.3060582,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970538,0.000259131,0.0005292951,0.000267099,0.0007278114,0.001162849],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9978819,0.0005076444,0.0002133752,0.0003980773,0.0002698363,0.000729118],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009655664,0.0001232749,0.4656564,0.00008947114,0.0002209532,0.0002663202,0.002448677,0.008746714,0.0004582906,0.01344984,0.4946333,0.01381012],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001305706,0.001312793,0.8149635,0.00008244463,0.00004109069,0.0001953384,0.0007229259,0.005967045,0.0001323845,0.09488127,0.08012515,0.0002703827],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9786742,0.0003957163,0.001711206,0.01217414,0.0003903663,0.001328234,0.000007476107,0.00001502048,0.005303658],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9942033,0.00001791411,0.00260251,0.0006750766,0.0002796879,0.00009687178,0.000006273661,0.00003268828,0.002085635],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4145082,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997651,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04158642239644426,"score_gpt":0.3125516911525315,"score_spread":0.2709652687560872,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}