{"id":"W1800519929","doi":"10.1111/1467-842x.00128","title":"Practical Maximum Pseudolikelihood for Spatial Point Patterns","year":2000,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Australian & New Zealand Journal of Statistics","topic":"Economic and Environmental Valuation","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":395,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Mathematics; Point process; Exponential family; Covariate; Poisson point process; Poisson distribution; Quasi-likelihood; Applied mathematics; Spatial analysis; Cox process; Computation; Spatial dependence; Exponential function; Generalized linear model; Statistics; Algorithm; Count data; Poisson process; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01068405,0.001164325,0.002078756,0.002894701,0.001214263,0.002968399,0.004212731,0.002486324,0.007537807],"category_scores_gemma":[0.08154352,0.001752276,0.002047092,0.003552983,0.002661491,0.005391276,0.004927441,0.003254596,0.00234808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001816071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002435784,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003687467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003700027,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9931328,0.004631289,0.0002551027,0.0005794554,0.001201311,0.0002001119],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9621112,0.03286814,0.001047515,0.002408489,0.001313724,0.0002510438],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001189195,0.00004837126,0.001355938,0.0002580513,0.0001180318,0.0002699443,0.0003886854,0.5555269,0.0008666042,0.3491785,0.003061158,0.08880886],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000155319,0.00001367487,0.0001727582,0.00002676288,0.000007569746,0.00007693195,0.00002837812,0.7594568,0.0003668729,0.2379272,0.001890488,0.00001695982],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001736768,0.00009945573,0.9970086,0.000114792,0.000009749177,0.00002299648,0.00005232484,0.0002161458,0.0007392237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.1379737,0.0004134336,0.8559731,0.0002079404,0.0001009143,0.0005766122,0.0007471951,0.0006089162,0.003398146],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01068405,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0565033,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09017917241294637,"score_gpt":0.2752519146079772,"score_spread":0.1850727421950308,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}