{"id":"W1801230807","doi":"10.1023/a:1026294332606","title":"Impact of Personal and Situational Factors on Taxpayer Compliance: An Experimental Analysis","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Business Ethics","topic":"Taxation and Compliance Studies","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":120,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McMaster University; York University","funders":"","keywords":"Taxpayer; Compliance (psychology); Audit; Public economics; Business; Business ethics; Incentive; Accounting; Tax evasion; Situational ethics; Preference; Psychology; Social psychology; Actuarial science; Economics; Public relations; Microeconomics; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004705177,0.0001093672,0.0004146204,0.0003208187,0.0001112203,0.00003525555,0.00008082479,0.00007858539,0.0003521936],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000350563,0.00009500633,0.0001841695,0.0004467174,0.00009895999,0.0002336884,0.00001077667,0.0002546142,0.000004332082],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007783851,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007275991,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00004620823,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000008371354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991471,0.00003187562,0.0004779604,0.0001269089,0.0001135304,0.0001026497],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9985187,0.0001098923,0.0008748737,0.00008527765,0.0003476985,0.00006352289],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00007328411,0.0004086468,0.9585485,0.00002267062,0.0007187105,0.000002304158,0.004938263,0.003121869,0.0002732229,0.03174703,0.00008262489,0.00006285365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004418567,0.0001761026,0.9958534,0.00001832373,0.00003070117,0.000006416903,0.0007454384,0.0003876873,0.0001094785,0.001864796,0.000254,0.0001117566],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9939743,0.0009884612,0.00343671,0.0002206483,0.000156752,0.00003109645,0.0000490738,0.000002689525,0.001140244],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9991754,0.0001311937,0.0005066941,0.00007930415,0.0000422508,7.046113e-7,0.00000406395,0.00000686698,0.00005354474],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03730492,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3874246,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2287801905039362,"score_gpt":0.3529126103016738,"score_spread":0.1241324197977376,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}