{"id":"W1804043484","doi":"10.1002/rds.20051","title":"Modeling of the perfect electromagnetic conducting boundary in the finite difference time domain method","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Radio Science","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Boundary (topology); Boundary value problem; Collocation (remote sensing); Finite difference method; Mathematical analysis; Wedge (geometry); Mathematics; Computational electromagnetics; Computer science; Point (geometry); Electromagnetic field; Geometry; Physics; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004081583,0.0002616225,0.0003846188,0.000263601,0.0002660669,0.0005472977,0.0009339396,0.0009230923,0.001297995],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0008124274,0.0001959329,0.0002997801,0.0002034072,0.0005873367,0.0005430516,0.0004420912,0.0004053538,0.0003132627],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003248747,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006551779,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001431432,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007450325,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997868,0.0000607618,0.000009899832,0.00002472812,0.00009990984,0.00001794311],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997342,0.0001155927,0.00003272434,0.0000370804,0.00006672951,0.00001356903],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004500892,0.00003751953,0.0006898551,0.0001147511,0.00001139551,0.0002590292,0.0001274931,0.9002726,0.03221365,0.04861427,0.0006687348,0.01694559],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003645758,0.000008913928,0.00004562853,0.000005692679,0.000001648243,0.00003826638,0.000007810501,0.9950596,0.002351817,0.001228372,0.001245489,0.000003158169],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.01690575,0.00009548969,0.9775923,0.00005725692,0.00003098128,0.00002883928,0.00003060166,0.0001922899,0.005066422],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6014782,0.000225713,0.3924802,0.00006760897,0.00002155783,0.0001324498,0.0001074631,0.00007066168,0.005416215],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.001431432,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004342198,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02020306947848396,"score_gpt":0.2722723081316089,"score_spread":0.2520692386531249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}