{"id":"W1804043484","doi":"10.1002/rds.20051","title":"Modeling of the perfect electromagnetic conducting boundary in the finite difference time domain method","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Radio Science","topic":"Electromagnetic Simulation and Numerical Methods","field":"Engineering","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Finite-difference time-domain method; Boundary (topology); Boundary value problem; Collocation (remote sensing); Finite difference method; Mathematical analysis; Wedge (geometry); Mathematics; Computational electromagnetics; Computer science; Point (geometry); Electromagnetic field; Geometry; Physics; Optics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001419573,0.0001110472,0.0001537408,0.00009004831,0.0001629142,0.00007711372,0.0006634016,0.00003253242,0.0000904402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003880683,0.00006607465,0.00004600223,0.00130605,0.0002338964,0.0001351785,0.00003587933,0.0002575506,0.00001061026],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005291503,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00006125505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00005853934,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000002077571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9986143,0.0002678713,0.0002313206,0.0001906694,0.0003419841,0.0003539042],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988958,0.0006591727,0.00002999224,0.0003296541,0.00004214609,0.00004320378],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000135766,0.00001182767,0.000147715,0.00001098389,0.000002234095,3.351035e-7,0.001212393,0.1110801,0.874679,0.0003404504,0.00001014346,0.01250349],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001101091,0.00006796297,0.005227605,0.0000159501,0.000004047619,0.00001240701,0.00007481712,0.9838371,0.007342465,0.003200436,0.00001565058,0.00009147274],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9525691,0.0002905169,0.04388401,0.0002147204,0.00009331588,0.0002468412,3.496659e-7,0.00003968362,0.002661471],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9517772,0.000006863109,0.04801142,0.00009516481,0.00002069185,0.00001882804,1.421968e-7,0.000008694846,0.00006096788],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.872757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2694446,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02020306947848396,"score_gpt":0.2722723081316089,"score_spread":0.2520692386531249,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}