{"id":"W1805646557","doi":"10.1186/1471-2288-5-8","title":"Evaluating the role of quality assessment of primary studies in systematic reviews of cancer practice guidelines","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"BMC Medical Research Methodology","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":47,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University Health Network; Hamilton Regional Laboratory Medicine Program; Cancer Care Ontario; University of Toronto; McMaster University","funders":"Ontario Ministry of Health and Long-Term Care; Cancer Care Ontario","keywords":"Systematic review; Quality (philosophy); Medicine; MEDLINE; Quality of evidence; Quality assessment; Primary care; Psychology; Family medicine; Meta-analysis; Political science; External quality assessment; Pathology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8623785,0.003962799,0.01411389,0.0222112,0.003307284,0.0146875,0.006815006,0.0077583,0.002326581],"category_scores_gemma":[0.9475702,0.004803216,0.02434419,0.0197997,0.01066382,0.01159078,0.008349862,0.006460859,0.0002956852],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01713855,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02480309,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.007468819,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01005732,"domain_scores_codex":[0.03847769,0.7653196,0.1575529,0.007541308,0.03032837,0.0007800822],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.01009412,0.8755192,0.06842076,0.02368627,0.02156045,0.0007193096],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01059165,0.0003512705,0.1589594,0.3305745,0.3300422,0.0004345533,0.009169754,0.005642627,0.0008420974,0.009555683,0.0045879,0.1392483],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01430732,0.008898542,0.1278506,0.3315222,0.3899582,0.001580665,0.002852007,0.02556277,0.005736101,0.06051375,0.02972475,0.001493088],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05757244,0.721141,0.1520666,0.02703796,0.005863679,0.02726541,0.002907872,0.0004497491,0.005695284],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7515718,0.05310029,0.1509607,0.006567809,0.00195695,0.03416213,0.001092662,0.000214252,0.0003734177],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1376215,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1697118,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9955758562608554,"score_gpt":0.8622804684686729,"score_spread":0.1332953877921825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}