{"id":"W1811937173","doi":"10.1088/1367-2630/18/5/053001","title":"Sifting attacks in finite-size quantum key distribution","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"New Journal of Physics","topic":"Quantum Information and Cryptography","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":25,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"Sandia National Laboratories; Stichting voor de Technische Wetenschappen; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; Industry Canada; Ministry of Education - Singapore","keywords":"Eavesdropping; Key (lock); Quantum key distribution; Protocol (science); Computer science; Physics; Computer security; Quantum; Quantum mechanics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00653666,0.0005189748,0.001192249,0.0012554,0.001418493,0.001996171,0.001656572,0.00252283,0.002185405],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02288391,0.0007580409,0.0015079,0.001559382,0.007775005,0.006160128,0.00413217,0.003680185,0.000523043],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002667719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001234727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009515664,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003203752,"domain_scores_codex":[0.993046,0.002887035,0.000279643,0.0008036517,0.00239782,0.0005859051],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9755018,0.01766001,0.002044273,0.004084188,0.0004557972,0.0002538789],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000416346,0.00005637178,0.001133035,0.0001239645,0.0000659359,0.0004515679,0.0005478086,0.07900247,0.008846471,0.8862457,0.001624338,0.02148604],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001460416,0.0001430925,0.0004387401,0.00005408892,0.00003440954,0.0004074188,0.0000894804,0.4018206,0.009562749,0.5847265,0.002512826,0.00006409242],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1236345,0.0007259635,0.8607103,0.001765403,0.00009906372,0.0001680552,0.0001200261,0.001036434,0.01174031],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9376474,0.0003958235,0.05944087,0.0003233046,0.00008436253,0.0002013259,0.00005882528,0.0001089374,0.001739122],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00653666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03456956,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01717412943810782,"score_gpt":0.2487211190532032,"score_spread":0.2315469896150954,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}