{"id":"W1811953303","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v35i4.183521","title":"Analysing Arguments in Networked Conversations: The Context of Student Teachers","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods","field":"Psychology","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"University of Houston","keywords":"Argumentation theory; Meaning (existential); Context (archaeology); Process (computing); Computer science; Online discussion; Knowledge building; Knowledge management; Discourse analysis; Mathematics education; Conceptual change; Epistemology; Pedagogy; Sociology; Psychology; Linguistics; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001656537,0.00006645254,0.0001415606,0.0003593316,0.00007851944,0.00002197155,0.0001816984,0.00004765717,0.0009090999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00005528923,0.00005242685,0.00004833131,0.0003465462,0.0000724714,0.00007888057,0.000002517133,0.0003615332,0.00001149883],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003507584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006597239,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.005481462,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002934326,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9985039,0.0007659831,0.0003975657,0.0000733899,0.0001000126,0.0001591379],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9990945,0.0001187743,0.0003963661,0.0001357034,0.0001651938,0.00008946129],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001372008,0.0001231051,0.7837327,0.000002245992,0.0001739286,0.000002796732,0.09721456,0.0006252321,0.00008051012,0.00384519,0.03261208,0.0815739],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000308526,0.00003361787,0.803561,0.00004280045,0.00003249966,0.000007227513,0.0105397,0.000005250453,0.00001072047,0.0001003159,0.1853083,0.00005000981],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9870239,0.002422372,0.0001714865,0.00425678,0.001779646,0.00007767469,7.054353e-7,0.000001969573,0.004265448],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9923126,0.000001991003,0.0006929151,0.001023783,0.0004185532,0.000003166379,0.000002709109,0.000008070611,0.005536183],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1526962,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9954006,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04472472250692659,"score_gpt":0.4063633170988057,"score_spread":0.3616385945918791,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}