{"id":"W1813242488","doi":"","title":"The Language of Supreme Court Briefs: A Large-Scale Quantitative Investigation","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Appellate Practice and Process","topic":"Legal Education and Practice Innovations","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Supreme court; Law; Skepticism; Political science; Scope (computer science); Majority opinion; Sociology; Psychology; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006875135,0.00005581526,0.0000905132,0.00004206642,0.0006836792,0.0001581776,0.0002402682,0.00005144096,0.00005578775],"category_scores_gemma":[0.005223735,0.00003223753,0.00002324547,0.0003921475,0.0003499052,0.001396212,0.00001553189,0.0006663107,0.000007597149],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000008448806,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006866975,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007919362,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001825237,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987463,0.0004066479,0.0003096347,0.00004952281,0.0003614262,0.0001264984],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9949997,0.002834535,0.000959488,0.0001011198,0.001041557,0.00006361354],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005523244,0.0001681514,0.001393467,0.00004608808,0.0001238093,0.00000229074,0.9135854,0.00002245028,0.008357278,0.0647594,0.005823166,0.00516622],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003188848,0.0001181688,0.0007943502,0.00003518321,0.0001645877,0.00006803142,0.5561821,0.0001078058,0.00283125,0.008738125,0.4305507,0.00009081871],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8122218,0.000689777,0.0001810713,0.1695486,0.0003925728,0.000144914,0.000003032885,0.000006346627,0.01681192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9965128,0.001022085,0.0007780133,0.0009600342,0.000198421,0.000001083092,6.216725e-7,0.000005446254,0.0005214968],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4247275,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6253676,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02534471768660764,"score_gpt":0.3886354509415238,"score_spread":0.3632907332549162,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}