{"id":"W1813743414","doi":"","title":"Arabic Uniglossia: Diglossia Revisited","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Studies in literature and language","topic":"Multilingual Education and Policy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":7,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Diglossia; Linguistics; Speech community; Sociolinguistics; Variety (cybernetics); Phenomenon; Sociology; Classical Arabic; Standard language; Dictatorship; Virtue; Corollary; Arabic; History; Politics; Political science; Democracy; Epistemology; Philosophy; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004809372,0.00008369937,0.0001481513,0.00008787046,0.0001440425,0.00008286764,0.00008179886,0.00007095298,0.00002103597],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009683583,0.00006524129,0.00002046909,0.0004544195,0.0002360699,0.0001307759,0.00003226048,0.00014799,0.000009366224],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00005085819,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00007912594,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003425103,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005291121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992527,0.0001559265,0.0001218473,0.0001466606,0.0001322415,0.0001905668],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995593,0.00008278463,0.00003333718,0.0001107556,0.00009892699,0.0001148826],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009695115,0.00002102032,0.002699152,0.00003180273,0.00001292967,0.00003344272,0.9543762,2.229005e-7,0.000006508968,0.02318292,0.01032861,0.009297454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00044657,0.00002655251,0.002138406,0.0002543031,0.000009536056,0.000004532983,0.2339712,0.000003283494,0.00001083257,0.001897534,0.7610648,0.0001724784],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6401325,0.1410693,0.000001791356,0.003225115,0.0006930545,0.0002136769,0.00001449557,0.00007157442,0.2145786],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9821328,0.001669506,0.0001518034,0.001209409,0.0007942893,0.000009278177,0.00001078112,0.000005267513,0.01401687],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7507362,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2660463,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0965598228444497,"score_gpt":0.50500592904286,"score_spread":0.4084461061984103,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}