{"id":"W1815418137","doi":"10.1111/j.1469-1809.2007.00404.x","title":"Testing for Equality of Standardized Composite Measures of Linkage Disequilibrium","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Annals of Human Genetics","topic":"Genetic Associations and Epidemiology","field":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","cited_by":3,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto; Dalhousie University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Linkage disequilibrium; Disequilibrium; Consistency (knowledge bases); Variance (accounting); Measure (data warehouse); Linkage (software); Mathematics; Statistics; Composite number; Econometrics; Genetics; Biology; Genotype; Computer science; Algorithm; Economics; Medicine; Haplotype; Discrete mathematics; Data mining; Accounting","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07271769,0.0007453784,0.002132861,0.003418553,0.0009232254,0.003696903,0.002120703,0.001610958,0.005150575],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3406163,0.0005234026,0.001584835,0.003431428,0.005749336,0.004163179,0.0041256,0.002513561,0.0005206808],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008862945,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001311748,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005842402,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004187188,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9091254,0.05163726,0.005366149,0.01710771,0.01486407,0.001899383],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6264063,0.3195334,0.01317249,0.02845578,0.01069826,0.001733848],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002567406,0.0003613812,0.368515,0.00123087,0.003816256,0.001225827,0.005388101,0.01884127,0.0110497,0.3209171,0.003932288,0.2621548],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005387659,0.002419607,0.249734,0.0003518256,0.0006889304,0.002643863,0.001618663,0.1174126,0.01255861,0.5985523,0.01307161,0.0004090953],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.3464302,0.0005964192,0.6395909,0.0005270363,0.0002741119,0.0004604243,0.001586475,0.0003258422,0.01020858],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8634006,0.000165456,0.1330414,0.0002710595,0.00009197101,0.0009607796,0.001351401,0.0001162313,0.0006010043],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.07271769,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.3845725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1470752987555434,"score_gpt":0.3946885049024395,"score_spread":0.247613206146896,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}