{"id":"W1818928769","doi":"10.1039/c5ja00203f","title":"Optimization of the double spike technique using peak jump collection by a Monte Carlo method: an example for the determination of Ca isotope ratios","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Analytical Atomic Spectrometry","topic":"Nuclear Physics and Applications","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":26,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"National Research Council Canada","funders":"National Natural Science Foundation of China","keywords":"Jump; Monte Carlo method; Spike (software development); Isotope; Chemistry; Statistics; Mathematics; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Computer science; Chromatography; Physics; Nuclear physics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005651438,0.00008888201,0.0002340892,0.0001002535,0.0001006076,0.00003138821,0.00021732,0.0000358559,0.00004076909],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001524419,0.00005754167,0.0001834186,0.0005542849,0.00005176435,0.000158173,0.00003058409,0.000142458,2.18621e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00009352595,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001545752,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000546307,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000004728324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990976,0.00005581019,0.0004239123,0.0001026816,0.0002141835,0.0001058132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986601,0.0001146867,0.0005689777,0.0002024064,0.0003945333,0.00005933359],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001444321,0.003571614,0.01313614,0.0001434722,0.001483673,0.000001098099,0.002479548,0.2026793,0.6104811,0.1394277,0.01415003,0.011002],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001068702,0.0002678343,0.0003806817,0.00002748125,0.0003555662,0.00001062129,0.000758321,0.9229271,0.066131,0.007360732,0.0005956016,0.0001163765],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2024286,0.00001774128,0.7967296,0.0001574266,0.0000478507,0.0003421687,0.00001708746,0.0000024657,0.0002570739],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9485647,0.000001951709,0.05114318,0.000009437407,0.0001699699,0.000009773102,0.000002828725,0.00001419757,0.00008396079],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.7461361,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2346481,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03996321196985572,"score_gpt":0.3219773815403956,"score_spread":0.2820141695705399,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}