{"id":"W1820629761","doi":"10.1139/t2012-002","title":"Revisiting the three-dimensional slope stability problem in clay","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Geotechnical Engineering and Analysis","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Safety factor; Expression (computer science); Slope stability; Geotechnical engineering; Factor of safety; Limit (mathematics); Stability (learning theory); Benchmark (surveying); Slope stability analysis; Mathematics; Surface (topology); Applied mathematics; Mathematical analysis; Geology; Geometry; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00154491,0.0001923822,0.0002520065,0.0002067813,0.0001764337,0.0000682589,0.0003621606,0.0001990166,0.0003558215],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001891963,0.0001436186,0.0001579494,0.0005653074,0.00006443178,0.0001730373,0.00003652838,0.001521054,0.00005308812],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000479128,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001194976,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002215695,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001457516,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981829,0.00005085403,0.0004786663,0.0001367432,0.0002539237,0.0008969132],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987143,0.0001148429,0.00003776934,0.0003019581,0.00005007965,0.0007810771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000002400935,0.00001153069,0.002887028,0.00002692043,0.00004008281,0.00003818007,0.0000357589,0.9623729,0.0006796557,0.0003423502,0.0008829332,0.03268028],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004869914,0.0000303763,0.06095427,0.0003262775,0.00008611369,0.0007562721,0.00006164878,0.8618379,0.000296626,0.001519971,0.0727722,0.000871362],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7791203,0.01867848,0.1632265,0.02642972,0.002176314,0.001414329,0.0000874399,0.001686464,0.007180527],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981235,0.0000287341,0.001114107,0.0001593102,0.0005163274,0.00001166594,0.000002860181,0.0000313339,0.00001216243],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2190032,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6608307,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01216316885456607,"score_gpt":0.1998646326189819,"score_spread":0.1877014637644158,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}