{"id":"W1822212600","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2013-0080","title":"Adapting Hazus for seismic risk assessment in Canada","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Landslides and related hazards","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Geological Survey of Canada","funders":"Natural Resources Canada; Federal Emergency Management Agency; Public Safety Canada; Indiana University-Purdue University Indianapolis","keywords":"Natural hazard; Forensic engineering; Seismic risk; Landslide; Earthquake scenario; Natural (archaeology); Agency (philosophy); Hazard; Natural disaster; Risk management; Emergency management; Risk analysis (engineering); Engineering; Civil engineering; Environmental planning; Seismic hazard; Environmental science; Geotechnical engineering; Geology; Geography; Business; Meteorology; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007180862,0.0008051099,0.0004381656,0.001262006,0.001527066,0.002030326,0.00207847,0.0005168715,0.004630105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002306246,0.0004289628,0.0006699303,0.001566411,0.0006259018,0.000722574,0.001227621,0.0005659129,0.0005553902],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02279693,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03399031,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.980275,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9820717,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994794,0.00008569004,0.00002599719,0.00004731202,0.0002481418,0.0001135121],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988211,0.0001238219,0.0000494696,0.00005423637,0.0008615163,0.00008991853],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00008951603,0.00005415366,0.0124226,0.00005372558,0.00004407283,0.0002149714,0.0001939504,0.9137688,0.0006873857,0.01868902,0.006741423,0.04704041],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000257065,0.000026926,0.003891382,0.00002856445,0.00002015372,0.0000415013,0.0003501592,0.9788483,0.000483394,0.002920919,0.0133212,0.00004174312],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.4722266,0.0009168879,0.3388442,0.003728647,0.0002513795,0.001316379,0.01434483,0.004177105,0.1641942],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8256236,0.0009493715,0.1416339,0.0001613424,0.00001918694,0.0002493695,0.003278774,0.0003108541,0.02777351],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.02279693,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1654041,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005902850117573614,"score_gpt":0.1989212744792077,"score_spread":0.1930184243616341,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}