{"id":"W1824826039","doi":"10.4204/eptcs.186.5","title":"Systematic Verification of the Modal Logic Cube in Isabelle/HOL","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Proceedings in Theoretical Computer Science","topic":"Logic, programming, and type systems","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":13,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft","keywords":"HOL; Cube (algebra); Higher-order logic; Computer science; Modal; Modal logic; Programming language; Embedding; Multimodal logic; Automation; Normal modal logic; Accessibility relation; Automated theorem proving; Dynamic logic (digital electronics); Algorithm; Theoretical computer science; Description logic; Mathematics; Artificial intelligence; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0106391,0.001110036,0.0009725305,0.001203497,0.002235705,0.002533896,0.002670071,0.001273534,0.007162331],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02162398,0.00133775,0.002797669,0.0007099799,0.004360477,0.005259116,0.006329879,0.003708564,0.001676763],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002319298,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.008852219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006008806,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007887334,"domain_scores_codex":[0.985919,0.005645728,0.0004628448,0.001426741,0.005014715,0.00153099],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9713897,0.01789511,0.001076665,0.006227449,0.003047791,0.0003632771],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001016,0.0007016587,0.004715397,0.002262466,0.0005576647,0.001710919,0.003029657,0.1232448,0.09303685,0.5245858,0.02383415,0.2213047],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0004659635,0.0003849302,0.001543562,0.000384291,0.0003261176,0.0006134973,0.0004881065,0.4741272,0.2030295,0.2699069,0.04849645,0.0002334864],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02764551,0.0001775797,0.9551992,0.0007042682,0.0001155824,0.0003129493,0.000398284,0.01163368,0.003813012],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.3335916,0.0003644183,0.6591787,0.0006915354,0.00006939073,0.0005056831,0.00107399,0.001812366,0.002712433],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0106391,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.05626559,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01391705845651953,"score_gpt":0.2437346175284077,"score_spread":0.2298175590718882,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}