{"id":"W1827751440","doi":"10.1111/j.0021-8901.2004.00975.x","title":"Mapping uncertainty: sensitivity of wildlife habitat ratings to expert opinion","year":2004,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Applied Ecology","topic":"Species Distribution and Climate Change","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":133,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Northern British Columbia","funders":"","keywords":"Habitat; Expert opinion; Wildlife; Expert elicitation; Range (aeronautics); Environmental resource management; Resource (disambiguation); Ecology; Environmental science; Statistics; Geography; Computer science; Mathematics; Engineering; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005081921,0.00008893696,0.0002512604,0.00005209606,0.00006308329,0.000008066761,0.0001081109,0.00007003241,0.002607799],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00007266022,0.00007944915,0.00006758314,0.0001779152,0.0001101221,0.00006355193,0.0001015763,0.0001143812,0.0001800741],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006392479,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002404712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00006020467,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003110976,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991086,0.00002647196,0.0003454159,0.0001189571,0.0001959619,0.000204637],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9994065,0.00007345386,0.0002841542,0.00009104121,0.00002484197,0.0001200398],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005364724,0.0007149118,0.02397681,0.00002814354,0.00007971378,0.00006287561,0.008231896,0.0325295,0.864212,0.005528375,0.05736274,0.006736573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.004724434,0.001262678,0.7546185,0.00007754336,0.00001699136,0.0003981325,0.02716899,0.0001378273,0.04555295,0.003211843,0.1621888,0.0006412837],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9884993,0.00000889556,0.001154126,0.003674225,0.0002931163,0.0001154638,0.000005896794,0.000007554228,0.006241382],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9960952,0.00003997228,0.0009062495,0.002864477,0.00007329459,0.000003899898,0.000003201146,0.000005971194,0.000007674385],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.818659,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9983039,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02005280079349979,"score_gpt":0.2555838265496744,"score_spread":0.2355310257561746,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}