{"id":"W1828260194","doi":"10.14713/ejbe.v1i3.765","title":"Numerical Fracture Mechanics Analysis of Cracked Fibre-Metal Laminates with Cut-Outs","year":2007,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Electronic Journal of Boundary Elements","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Bridging (networking); Materials science; Finite element method; Composite material; Stress intensity factor; Fracture mechanics; Boundary element method; Stress field; Stress concentration; Numerical analysis; Structural engineering; Mathematics; Engineering; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0009444227,0.000273449,0.0007180633,0.0005470413,0.00007191637,0.00004624304,0.0004200117,0.0001150466,0.0004283159],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003126474,0.0002252438,0.0003200911,0.001022023,0.00003266284,0.0002924621,0.00002789352,0.0007745,0.000006567993],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003404516,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000173039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000005523203,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00004369479,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971961,0.00004735043,0.000997014,0.0001669423,0.0008210121,0.000771612],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987357,0.0001252314,0.0004552323,0.0002611308,0.0002467951,0.0001759182],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003560413,0.002534578,0.0353177,0.0004127939,0.05353752,0.0008940863,0.001791716,0.07968476,0.7422211,0.00912263,0.002400584,0.06852213],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006926784,0.01066291,0.03446165,0.000373598,0.01510951,0.0005754928,0.0005033042,0.03740733,0.8402466,0.008351467,0.04324339,0.002137923],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7526031,0.001509001,0.2454229,0.00004700876,0.0001319679,0.0001172678,0.000006965972,0.00004145494,0.0001202793],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.996925,0.00009423563,0.00275297,0.00005036896,0.0000664707,0.000001408384,0.0000189232,0.00004378063,0.00004687464],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2443219,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9185174,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.004467693863346935,"score_gpt":0.2362029654031839,"score_spread":0.2317352715398369,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}