{"id":"W1829391012","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03381.x","title":"3D visualization and quantification of rat cortical bone porosity using a desktop micro‐CT system: a case study in the tibia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Microscopy","topic":"Bone health and osteoporosis research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Porosity; Histology; Cortical bone; Materials science; Biomedical engineering; Tibia; Confidence interval; X-ray microtomography; High resolution; Tomography; Synchrotron; Nuclear medicine; Medicine; Anatomy; Radiology; Geology; Pathology; Physics; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0007300635,0.0003026085,0.0002981346,0.0009561381,0.0001818585,0.0003841675,0.0002686826,0.0006361373,0.0008402858],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007256772,0.0003209928,0.0002662356,0.0006092379,0.0004744982,0.000189153,0.0002729219,0.0003075565,0.0001975552],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002775386,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003601146,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004851866,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006878388,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997111,0.00004301072,0.00001556263,0.00005775254,0.0001317492,0.00004065069],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992638,0.0002943187,0.0001116583,0.0001227453,0.0001695332,0.00003799634],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005120793,0.0001864677,0.01587182,0.0002680471,0.0000429384,0.005219878,0.0004663315,0.006250069,0.9403965,0.0003208755,0.0001166948,0.03034819],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005309444,0.002509314,0.1503719,0.000119124,0.0002576786,0.05817937,0.0008779779,0.05314358,0.7310102,0.0003565026,0.002980889,0.0001404299],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9690091,0.001016253,0.02887572,0.0000467255,0.000005933482,0.00006721237,0.0001467471,0.000159025,0.000673353],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9668987,0.0009166909,0.03125333,0.00001767611,0.000006800551,0.00003295528,0.00008849469,0.00003755558,0.0007478691],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004851866,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.00964725,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05293303406499267,"score_gpt":0.4204612177357493,"score_spread":0.3675281836707566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}