{"id":"W1829391012","doi":"10.1111/j.1365-2818.2010.03381.x","title":"3D visualization and quantification of rat cortical bone porosity using a desktop micro‐CT system: a case study in the tibia","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Microscopy","topic":"Bone health and osteoporosis research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of British Columbia; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Porosity; Histology; Cortical bone; Materials science; Biomedical engineering; Tibia; Confidence interval; X-ray microtomography; High resolution; Tomography; Synchrotron; Nuclear medicine; Medicine; Anatomy; Radiology; Geology; Pathology; Physics; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002722669,0.00008949848,0.0003604288,0.0001966259,0.0001207116,0.0000380061,0.00006696604,0.00005929189,0.000007866528],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002760695,0.00005982795,0.00004454183,0.0002746925,0.000103107,0.00009179256,0.00002192243,0.0005410604,9.84295e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000657686,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003060961,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007330361,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0004514589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9982866,0.0003014125,0.0007751985,0.0001232707,0.0003326893,0.0001808299],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987875,0.0001478509,0.0003910263,0.0001984038,0.0003429719,0.0001322586],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004272769,0.0006159132,0.1853868,0.0003131741,0.00001081733,0.001249699,0.001877541,6.530255e-7,0.8098632,0.00001213757,0.00006118967,0.0001816836],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01237634,0.004366221,0.4838832,0.001205816,0.0006073928,0.1727173,0.0476767,0.004085407,0.2725619,0.000009050611,0.0002312635,0.0002793867],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9982683,0.0004026236,0.000370704,0.0001378868,0.0001999826,0.0006094113,0.000002281442,0.000003298038,0.000005494349],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984452,0.00003285927,0.001367516,0.00005939664,0.00007136152,0.000002026406,0.000001549892,0.00001037441,0.000009734522],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5373012,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2439713,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05293303406499267,"score_gpt":0.4204612177357493,"score_spread":0.3675281836707566,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}