{"id":"W1831646169","doi":"","title":"Interpretation d'une Controverse Scientifique: Strategies Argumentatives d'Adolescentes et d'Adolescents Quebecois (Interpretation of a Scientific Controversy: Argument Strategies of Adolescents and Quebecois Adolescents).","year":2003,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Science Mathematics and Technology Education","topic":"Science Education and Pedagogy","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Interpretation (philosophy); Argument (complex analysis); Psychology; Philosophy; Linguistics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.06880713,0.0008264151,0.00102566,0.005279566,0.02907689,0.01997143,0.003644574,0.01619357,0.00345443],"category_scores_gemma":[0.116453,0.0004972111,0.0008827371,0.004025113,0.038621,0.008113676,0.009826774,0.01358432,0.0002498128],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0449584,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.07859829,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4029831,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5146832,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9650862,0.0261662,0.000996055,0.0009020242,0.004225959,0.002623583],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8551902,0.1162714,0.005182302,0.0009326352,0.01669008,0.00573348],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005568637,0.00003685014,0.004140184,0.0005663934,0.00006139783,0.002008146,0.6453921,0.00009014102,0.0002641571,0.2632047,0.0618897,0.02229065],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005610235,0.00003519841,0.006187436,0.004534129,0.0001074574,0.0005762687,0.5297637,0.0002053917,0.0004500955,0.05791507,0.4001017,0.00006746725],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05548097,0.0669411,0.005019698,0.8163059,0.005923614,0.0002859879,0.00009596451,0.00003647967,0.0499103],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8259201,0.02823759,0.01045722,0.1113912,0.002082246,0.0006741126,0.00006375049,0.00006884701,0.0211049],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.5970169,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.801275,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01424405982549909,"score_gpt":0.3139084996040867,"score_spread":0.2996644397785876,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}