{"id":"W1832639942","doi":"10.3968/j.hess.1927024020120201.2198","title":"The Efficacy of Collaborative Strategic Reading on the Reading Comprehension of ESP Learners","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Higher education of social science","topic":"EFL/ESL Teaching and Learning","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":15,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Reading comprehension; Reading (process); Computer science; Mathematics education; Set (abstract data type); Test (biology); Significant difference; Comprehension; Psychology; Linguistics; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001866559,0.0002581639,0.0002572756,0.0005026344,0.000261761,0.0007713042,0.0002777393,0.0003641921,0.002310999],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008806786,0.0001105524,0.0002254022,0.0001928532,0.0006248855,0.0007478091,0.0004947725,0.0004285286,0.0003197031],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001813963,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0004433505,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004812037,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005971748,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987753,0.0006155825,0.00007146261,0.0001323555,0.0003102448,0.00009498104],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.992355,0.00529324,0.001015369,0.0003025107,0.0006058283,0.0004280524],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002335708,0.01305628,0.4184672,0.001520498,0.0002723107,0.002314792,0.07524394,0.0009655214,0.08702328,0.002196571,0.001241487,0.3953624],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001649457,0.01385508,0.9230924,0.0003180857,0.0004143992,0.001057277,0.02560972,0.001907364,0.02690633,0.001901366,0.004705401,0.00006775563],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9968618,0.0001073776,0.0001305607,0.00004752521,0.000003487884,0.00001510245,0.000006499003,0.000006099307,0.00282161],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989447,0.000132707,0.0003129417,0.00001458846,0.000006658439,0.00001468806,0.00001090017,0.00000206024,0.0005607658],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.002310999,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.009871423,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06983397567200876,"score_gpt":0.3375432836371517,"score_spread":0.267709307965143,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}