{"id":"W1832762784","doi":"10.1111/j.1467-9965.2010.00457.x","title":"INCORPORATING RISK AND AMBIGUITY AVERSION INTO A HYBRID MODEL OF DEFAULT","year":2010,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Mathematical Finance","topic":"Credit Risk and Financial Regulations","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":52,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Ambiguity aversion; Credit default swap; Ambiguity; Economics; Econometrics; Risk aversion (psychology); Default; Credit derivative; Valuation (finance); Credit risk; Credit default swap index; iTraxx; Bond; Computer science; Credit valuation adjustment; Actuarial science; Expected utility hypothesis; Financial economics; Finance","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00165779,0.000755985,0.001001918,0.0007791685,0.0004544121,0.002709616,0.002097293,0.002498695,0.00378279],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003544073,0.000645708,0.001326571,0.0007714218,0.001612832,0.00300492,0.001805642,0.002303998,0.0003553851],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001482746,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0008539329,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003863804,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002472928,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993468,0.0002727106,0.00003173069,0.0001162686,0.0001136384,0.0001188561],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984236,0.0008667696,0.0002588876,0.0001118477,0.0001353563,0.000203615],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009129461,0.00009683881,0.001293922,0.00003236059,0.00005228149,0.0004304865,0.000162543,0.634276,0.001154351,0.3568588,0.0008129679,0.004738184],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003190426,0.00002639017,0.0001971739,0.000005717015,0.00001225573,0.00005482578,0.0000171958,0.9240984,0.00005952843,0.07518582,0.0002953346,0.0000154392],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2366499,0.001203363,0.7229393,0.00373297,0.0001474141,0.00008637048,0.0004165631,0.0002452833,0.03457883],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9660891,0.0004223149,0.01848217,0.0001621633,0.00008521381,0.00007323254,0.00008176461,0.0000252409,0.01457871],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003863804,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01265466,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01861949860359469,"score_gpt":0.2174475340578033,"score_spread":0.1988280354542086,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}