{"id":"W1833202791","doi":"10.1139/t08-081","title":"Assessment of alternative protection layers for a geomembrane – geosynthetic clay liner (GM–GCL) composite liner","year":2008,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","topic":"Landfill Environmental Impact Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":68,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University","funders":"","keywords":"Geotextile; Geosynthetic clay liner; Geomembrane; Cushioning; Geotechnical engineering; Geosynthetics; Materials science; Composite number; Ultimate tensile strength; Pore water pressure; Tensile strain; Composite material; Geology; Hydraulic conductivity; Soil water","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003815607,0.0002225542,0.0003215465,0.0001311491,0.0004902193,0.00002341099,0.000321278,0.00014098,0.0006185641],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00008447987,0.0001803268,0.0001873538,0.000184105,0.000468286,0.000199742,0.0001034906,0.0004836685,0.00003756655],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001219351,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001038111,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01556196,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001849114,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981909,0.00006812625,0.0004454061,0.0002918562,0.0004389094,0.0005647455],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988294,0.00006635069,0.0002334895,0.0002304258,0.00002409183,0.0006162883],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002476943,0.0007831901,0.0386396,0.00007647984,0.0005550379,0.0006029873,0.001028365,0.5475574,0.3666941,0.00006313102,0.009601358,0.0341507],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005919587,0.002747867,0.7002863,0.0003156676,0.0003077744,0.005273684,0.0001306134,0.1886061,0.03306177,0.002060443,0.05938817,0.001901976],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9585719,0.0001081347,0.03193302,0.003651247,0.0004170777,0.001371053,0.0001611746,0.0000466036,0.003739802],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967718,0.0001279586,0.002082694,0.0004553469,0.0001374733,0.00005227817,0.000006998617,0.00003038159,0.0003351302],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6616467,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9909935,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02098337594719146,"score_gpt":0.2530671919370009,"score_spread":0.2320838159898095,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}