{"id":"W1833218127","doi":"10.1109/ccece.1993.332217","title":"A parametric method for the evaluation of human-computer interfaces","year":2002,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Safety Warnings and Signage","field":"Psychology","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Sherbrooke","funders":"","keywords":"Interface (matter); Computer science; Calculator; Selection (genetic algorithm); Parametric statistics; Field (mathematics); Quality (philosophy); Function (biology); Product (mathematics); User interface; Data mining; Human–computer interaction; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Programming language; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001431533,0.00005571358,0.0001002643,0.00007649493,0.00005329822,0.000009934796,0.0001368031,0.0000424192,0.009785504],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006090991,0.00003328036,0.00006296801,0.0001752793,0.00002032395,0.00002238515,0.00001701201,0.00005008877,0.00007402967],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000009474474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000002032965,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0000705136,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005334277,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999277,0.0001691706,0.0001670301,0.0001351408,0.0001492715,0.0001023675],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998786,0.0008166312,0.00008482529,0.0001959275,0.0001049388,0.00001167501],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00001839643,0.0001417859,0.0002860749,0.000007472384,0.0001787235,1.794623e-7,0.004528321,0.0005737708,0.0009503999,0.01765803,0.03953926,0.9361176],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003117803,0.0008876259,0.0438351,0.00001398705,0.0004002598,0.0000082345,0.001747944,0.9245099,0.003094526,0.005598018,0.01655195,0.0002346799],"study_design_candidate":"design_other","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1563649,0.001528193,0.7773939,0.0008240957,0.0006989613,0.0009475286,0.000003018246,0.00004666632,0.06219276],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9856151,0.000002387534,0.01069301,0.0001742491,0.00008307155,0.00007855101,9.236645e-7,0.000007220173,0.003345477],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.9358829,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9911197,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2250238668855523,"score_gpt":0.4596400888110347,"score_spread":0.2346162219254825,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}