{"id":"W1833987113","doi":"10.24908/pceea.v0i0.3860","title":"IDEA: AN INTEGRATED METHOD OF DECISION MAKING IN CONCEPTUAL DESIGN","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Proceedings of the Canadian Engineering Education Association (CEEA)","topic":"Design Education and Practice","field":"Engineering","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Toronto Metropolitan University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Compendium; Computer science; Process (computing); Interface (matter); Conceptual design; Engineering design process; Conceptual model; Software engineering; Quality (philosophy); Management science; Systems engineering; Engineering; Human–computer interaction; Database; Programming language","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001114083,0.0001439038,0.0001898335,0.0004665918,0.00004595695,0.00003604434,0.0003158928,0.0001634481,0.0001113026],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001622323,0.0001478391,0.00004902555,0.0008131504,0.0000152732,0.0004608365,0.00001008698,0.000261516,0.000005821084],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001301842,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005370368,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003804614,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002934779,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989643,0.00002594155,0.000401396,0.0001453695,0.0002232423,0.0002397319],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988666,0.0001989048,0.0002479236,0.0001109765,0.0004629817,0.0001126481],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001729129,0.001227917,0.1812158,0.001352357,0.0008267303,0.000001697025,0.1559753,0.1576564,0.0570063,0.1691561,0.0932656,0.1821428],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001420811,0.0002025324,0.6613598,0.001913352,0.0003060438,0.00004414991,0.01802684,0.1896351,0.0742168,0.007208616,0.04373327,0.001932767],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8234431,0.0006582623,0.1213684,0.00102758,0.01084561,0.002676751,0.00007685157,0.0006671476,0.03923627],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9167568,0.000008983538,0.08290826,0.00007027619,0.00004585246,0.00003494195,0.000002993254,0.00003451524,0.0001373925],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.480144,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6028703,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02883736774389842,"score_gpt":0.2663794890630629,"score_spread":0.2375421213191645,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}