{"id":"W1834931997","doi":"10.1139/cjfr-2014-0266","title":"A general method for assessing the effects of uncertainty in individual-tree volume model predictions on large-area volume estimates with a subtropical forest illustration","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Forest Research","topic":"Forest ecology and management","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":51,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Residual; Statistics; Monte Carlo method; Calibration; Volume (thermodynamics); Heteroscedasticity; Mathematics; Forest inventory; Mean squared error; Uncertainty analysis; Taiga; Range (aeronautics); Environmental science; Econometrics; Forest management; Forestry; Geography; Algorithm","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002503894,0.000115936,0.0001999597,0.0002979859,0.0003982561,0.00008226711,0.0004219928,0.00009989,0.00005855946],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0009881079,0.00007843634,0.00006486099,0.0003455003,0.0004410589,0.0002341979,0.00005069757,0.0004661675,0.000004827813],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0003817026,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003994915,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006777185,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.5385697,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981998,0.0002731046,0.0002964256,0.0001897613,0.000456212,0.0005846678],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987245,0.0005484133,0.0001345223,0.0002113715,0.00009235525,0.0002888437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004346582,0.00005212788,0.4778038,0.00002950406,0.00002564559,0.00001788334,0.0002610942,0.5082878,0.00002244977,0.008082068,0.004397814,0.0009763879],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005428393,0.0007359384,0.5452592,0.00005827483,0.00002135322,0.000009992934,0.00006744865,0.4440478,0.00001105532,0.008404454,0.0007894151,0.00005214273],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8294585,0.00001660249,0.1679854,0.001213074,0.00007595004,0.0005433143,0.00001279676,0.000003206495,0.000691154],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900261,0.00000288825,0.009371288,0.00008321952,0.00005196267,0.00006937786,0.00001084744,0.00001362494,0.0003706946],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.5317926,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998367,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03306225413359572,"score_gpt":0.3186971543186113,"score_spread":0.2856349001850156,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}