{"id":"W1835208334","doi":"10.1257/app.20150044","title":"Star Wars: The Empirics Strike Back","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"American Economic Journal Applied Economics","topic":"Meta-analysis and systematic reviews","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":419,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada; Conseil Régional, Île-de-France; European Commission","keywords":"Residual; Null (SQL); Interpretation (philosophy); Null hypothesis; Star (game theory); Econometrics; Measure (data warehouse); Statistics; Value (mathematics); Statistical hypothesis testing; Mathematics; Computer science; Linguistics; Algorithm; Philosophy; Data mining; Mathematical analysis","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1316103,0.001293209,0.003298339,0.01531054,0.002808745,0.01659182,0.002432206,0.004502851,0.012489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.4607566,0.001167345,0.002407393,0.01380751,0.01376387,0.01485233,0.006210458,0.005959617,0.002600143],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004227694,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003479994,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00440557,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004110921,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9160394,0.05268327,0.007766395,0.0095702,0.01269152,0.001249216],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.3965443,0.506788,0.0355111,0.03855348,0.01917649,0.0034266],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.001728784,0.0001354123,0.1347129,0.004104807,0.006307496,0.001102605,0.005917312,0.007731053,0.0006531941,0.2989858,0.1298119,0.4088086],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003555383,0.0003994348,0.05055278,0.006662349,0.001150661,0.001043917,0.006869104,0.0166717,0.0009556052,0.7552183,0.159914,0.0002065917],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1979706,0.143508,0.1014099,0.4710132,0.008488261,0.0003269884,0.004254787,0.001199609,0.07182866],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8964633,0.02217227,0.02072626,0.04890435,0.005068462,0.0001919111,0.001566523,0.0007035846,0.004203238],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8683897,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6960304,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.6667031312708307,"score_gpt":0.4668327225518069,"score_spread":0.1998704087190238,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}