{"id":"W1836591004","doi":"10.1111/lit.12050","title":"Envisioning possibilities: visualising as enquiry in literacy studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Literacy","topic":"Literacy, Media, and Education","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":24,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"","keywords":"Comics; Visualization; Meaning (existential); Literacy; Focus (optics); Conversation; Visual literacy; Foregrounding; Process (computing); Multimodality; Sociology; Computer science; Cognitive science; Linguistics; Psychology; Pedagogy; Communication; World Wide Web","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.03593571,0.001150211,0.0008214528,0.005010489,0.007692226,0.02217918,0.002214877,0.003200144,0.00805659],"category_scores_gemma":[0.07002657,0.0007867448,0.0007688694,0.003420498,0.04695531,0.01920093,0.01511794,0.004792974,0.0008238032],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004240355,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00370964,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002029998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002225873,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9536642,0.04216977,0.0007985716,0.001058176,0.001574221,0.0007350397],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9061918,0.08275004,0.001875172,0.00557117,0.002177318,0.001434664],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004469281,0.00002900232,0.0004194973,0.0002670034,0.000005307698,0.0002750671,0.8668045,0.000250201,0.001140734,0.1206894,0.0006936435,0.009380983],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005002812,0.00008923701,0.000724225,0.001582415,0.00001694961,0.0007344887,0.7391352,0.001174432,0.002470559,0.1182374,0.1357141,0.00007106051],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4048088,0.005635187,0.3560377,0.02313485,0.001217685,0.002116291,0.0004126803,0.000829212,0.2058075],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9355108,0.001194268,0.04971354,0.0008777989,0.00008312339,0.001179843,0.00008496623,0.0003120365,0.01104372],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.03593571,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1900485,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1193947843013628,"score_gpt":0.4074586066563856,"score_spread":0.2880638223550228,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}